Język Polski
English
Post-crisis Regulations of Systemically Important Banks. The End of the “Too Big to Fail” Doctrine?
Anna Dobrzańska
Jarosław Michalewicz
Abstract
The global financial crisis forced public authorities responsible for maintaining financial stability to resolve the issue of too big to fail institutions. Post-crisis reforms directed at systemically important banks have basically two objectives. The first goal is to increase loss-absorbing capacity of such institutions. The second aim is to ensure mechanisms and tools which will enable the public authorities to conduct orderly resolution of systemically important banks when their viability is threatened, while constraining negative consequences for stability of the financial system and the real economy. The purpose of this article is to present and assess regulatory actions taken to address problems related to systemically important banks. The article tries to define such institutions indicating the main criteria which determine their systemic importance. It also indicates reasons for which such institutions create systemic risk. The main analysis is focused on the key reforms, i.e. the additional capital buffers, the orderly resolution and the TLAC requirements.
Keywords:
systemically important banks, G-SIBs, “too big to fail”, capital buffers, resolution, TLAC, Basel IIIMost read articles by the same author(s)
- Anna Dobrzańska, European crisis management framework in the banking sector – main issues to address , Safe Bank: Vol. 84 No. 3 (2021)
- Magdalena Kozińska, Jarosław Michalewicz, Beata Zdanowicz, In Search of Ways for Financing a Bank’s Liquidity in Resolution , Safe Bank: Vol. 82 No. 1 (2021)
- Anna Dobrzańska, Assessment of the EU proposal for resolution of insurance companies – should the IRRD be a copy of the BRRD? , Safe Bank: Vol. 88 No. 3 (2022)
- Jarosław Michalewicz, Crisis wave in banking system of USA and Switzerland in March 2023 , Safe Bank: Vol. 91 No. 2 (2023)
- Anna Dobrzańska, Macroprudential Policy in the Time of a Pandemic , Safe Bank: Vol. 81 No. 4 (2020)
- Anna Dobrzańska, Towards the enhanced role of deposit guarantee schemes in the European Union crisis management framework , Safe Bank: Vol. 93 No. 4 (2023)
- Anna Dobrańska, Łukasz Kurowski, Countercyclical capital buffer as a macroprudential instrument. Experience gathered so far in the European Union , Safe Bank: Vol. 74 No. 1 (2019)
- Anna Dobrzańska, Macroprudential committees in the EU – an analysis of institutional arrangements , Safe Bank: Vol. 70 No. 1 (2018)
- Anna Dobrzańska, Macroprudential aspects of CRD IV/CRR , Safe Bank: Vol. 58 No. 1 (2015)
- Anna Dobrzańska, W kierunku jednolitego nadzoru bankowego w Unii Europejskiej , Safe Bank: Vol. 49 No. 4 (2012): Bezpieczny Bank
Details
References
Statistics
Authors
Citation rules
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.