O konieczności wprowadzenia w polskim prawie możliwości emitowania przez banki papierów wartościowych typu contingent convertible

Kamil Liberadzki; Marcin Liberadzki

Published: 2023-11-21

Vol. 62 No. 1 (2016)

– On the necessity of introducing into Polish law the possibility for banks to issue contingent convertible bonds

Kamil Liberadzki , Marcin Liberadzki

Abstract

The new generation of AT1 instruments commonly referred to as contingent convertibles, or CoCos, embed a unique feature of contingent conversion into common equity or mandatory write-down of principal value. This unique feature provides to the CoCo bonds the loss-absorption capacity on a going-concern basis, a regulatory goal that seems not to have been effectively implemented under the pre-crisis legal framework of tier-based capital structures. The use of CoCos for bank recovery and resolution purposes is a vital element of Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) legal framework and is discussed in detail in this article. The main problem stated in the article is that Poland has so far not introduced into its legal regime an instrument enabling issuing AT1 bonds. This may seriously hamper the process of full and consistent implementation of BRRD into Polish law.

Keywords:

contingent convertibles , CoCos , CRR , BRRD , bail-in , Additional Tier 1 , AT 1

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Liberadzki, K. ., & Liberadzki, M. (2023). – On the necessity of introducing into Polish law the possibility for banks to issue contingent convertible bonds. Safe Bank, 62(1), 52–72. Retrieved from https://ojs.bfg.pl/index.php/bb/article/view/307

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Kamil Liberadzki, Marcin Liberadzki, Regulatory aspects of financing banks’ sustainable activities. Green capital instruments , Safe Bank: Vol. 87 No. 2 (2022)
Kamil Liberadzki, Marcin Liberadzki, Loss absorption by capital instruments RT1 CoCos, Tier 2 and Tier 3 on the grounds of Solvency II and IRRD , Safe Bank: Vol. 90 No. 1 (2023)

References

Admati A., Hellwig M., The Bankers’ New Clothes. What’s Wrong with Banking and What to Do About It, Princeton University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar

Bauer D., Kramer F., The Risk of a Mortality Catastrophe, Working paper ma zostać opublikowany w: „Journal of Business & Economic Statistics”, 2015.
Google Scholar

Berle A.A. Jr., Participating Preferred Stock, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Mar. 1926).
Google Scholar

Blundell-Wignall A., Atkinson P., Roulet C., Bank business models and the Basel system: Complexity and interconnectedness, „OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends” 2013, Vol. 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fmt-2013-5jzb2rhkd65b
Google Scholar

Blundell-Wignall A., Roulet C., Bank Business Models, Capital Rules and Structural Separation Policies, „Journal of Financial Economic Policy”, 5(4) (2013): 339–360. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-06-2013-0025
Google Scholar

Bolton P., Samama F., Capital access bonds: Contingent capital with an option to convert, „Economic Policy”, kwiecień 2012.
Google Scholar

Buergi M.P.H., Pricing contingent convertibles: A general framework for application in practice, „Financial Markets and Portfolio Management” 2013, Vol. 27(1), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11408-012-0203-4
Google Scholar

De Spiegeleer J., van Hulle C., Schoutens W., The Handbook of Hybrid Securities: Convertible bonds, coco bonds and bail-in, Wiley Finance Series, London 2014.
Google Scholar

Distress-Contingent Convertible Bonds: A proposed solution to the Excess Debt Problem, „Harvard Law Review” 1991, Vol. 104, nr 8.
Google Scholar

Flannery M.J., No pain, no gain? Effecting market discipline via „reverse convertible debentures”, Technical report, Graduate School of Business and Administration, University of Florida, November 2002.
Google Scholar

Haldane A., We should Go Further Unbundling Banks. FT.Com, 2012. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1081920328?accountid=45618
Google Scholar

Iwanicz Drozdowska M. (red.), Restrukturyzacja banków w Unii Europejskiej w czasie globalnego kryzysu finansowego, Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej w Warszawie, Warszawa 2015.
Google Scholar

Lakdawalla D., Zanjani G., Catastrophe Bonds, Reinsurance, and the Optimal Collateralization of Risk-Transfer, NBER Working Paper No. 12742, grudzień 2006.
Google Scholar

Lee J.-P., Yu M.-T., Valuation of catastrophe reinsurance with catastrophe bonds, „Insurance: Mathematics and Economics” 41 (2007).
Google Scholar

Liberadzki K., Liberadzki M., Hybrid securities. Structuring, Pricing and Risk Assessment, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, New York 2015.
Google Scholar

Liberadzki K., Liberadzki M., Konstrukcja, Zasady emisji i wycena hybrydowych papierów wartościowych na eurorynku, Oficyna Wolters Kluwer business, Warszawa 2016.
Google Scholar

Liberadzki M., Облигации с высоким риском – предложения по структуризации сделок для Востчной Европы, „Roczniki Ekonomii i Zarządzania”, t. 6, nr 42, TN KUL, Lublin
Google Scholar

Marquardt C., Wiedman C., Earnings Management through Transaction Structuring: Contingent Convertible Debt and Diluted Earnings per Share, „Journal of Accounting Research”, Vol. 43, No. 2, May 2005.
Google Scholar

Ostaszewski J. (red.), Finanse, Difin, wydanie 6, Warszawa 2013.
Google Scholar

Rieger M.O., Why Do Investors Buy Bad Financial Products? Probability Misestimation Preferences in Financial Decisions, „The Journal of Behavioral Finance”, 2012, nr 13.
Google Scholar

Szczepańska O., Dobrzańska A., Zdanowicz B., Resolution, czyli nowe podejście do banków zagrożonych upadłością, Narodowy Bank Polski, Warszawa 2015.
Google Scholar