Modelowanie efektu zarażania ryzykiem systemowym w wybranych  systemach bankowych w Europie

Marta Karaś; Michał Stachura

doi:10.26354/bb.2.3.92.2023

Published: 2023-11-03

Vol. 92 No. 3 (2023)

Modelling the effect of systemic risk contagion in selected banking systems in Europe

Marta Karaś

, Michał Stachura

Section: Problems and Opinions

https://doi.org/10.26354/bb.2.3.92.2023

Abstract

Systemic contagion measurement is challenging in the European banking sector due to data availability issues and the specific nature of strong ownership ties between parent institutions and their subsidiaries. The paper presents a new approach that allows measuring the contagion effect generated by non-listed systemically important European banks based on their ties with listed – systemically important European banks. This approach is illustrated by an empirical study applying ΔCoVaR to 58 banks in the period 01.2006–04.2023, in which contagion was analyzed for 13 groups of related banks. The proposed approach makes it possible to significantly increase the pool of studied systemically important banks. Notably, it takes into account systemic risk characteristic of both: the mother bank and its subsidiaries, as well as the specificity of turbulence characteristic of each analyzed financial system. Therefore, the method is a useful alternative for regulators and central banks in European countries where using the CoVaR measure - in its classical form, is ineffective.

Keywords:

systemic risk , portfolio-based risk measures , CoVaR , systemically important banks , contagion

JEL Codes

G32, C58, E44

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Karaś, M., & Stachura, M. (2023). Modelling the effect of systemic risk contagion in selected banking systems in Europe. Safe Bank, 92(3), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.26354/bb.2.3.92.2023

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Michał Boda, Marta Anita Karaś, Impact of ESG on the financial stability of banks listed in Europe , Safe Bank: Vol. 91 No. 2 (2023)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi. 2015. “Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks.” American Economic Review 105 (2): 564–608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130456.
Google Scholar

Acharya, Viral V. 2009. “A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation”. Journal of Financial Stability, 5 (3), s. 224–255.
Google Scholar

Acharya, Viral, and Alberto Bisin. 2014. “Counterparty Risk Externality: Centralized versus over-the-Counter Markets.” Journal of Economic Theory 149 (January): 153–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2013.07.001.
Google Scholar

Acharya, Viral, and Raghuram Rajan. 2022. “Liquidity, Liquidity Everywhere, Not a Drop to Use – Why Flooding Banks with Central Bank Reserves May Not Expand Liquidity.” Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w29680.
Google Scholar

Adrian, T., and Brunnermeier, M. 2016. CoVaR. American Economic Review 106(7), 1705–41 (https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120555).
Google Scholar

Afonso, Gara, and Hyun Song Shin. 2011. “Precautionary Demand and Liquidity in Payment Systems.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43 (October): 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00454.x.
Google Scholar

Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale. 2000. “Financial Contagion”. Journal of Political Economy 108: 1–33.
Google Scholar

Anand, Kartik, Prasanna Gai, Sujit Kapadia, Simon Brennan, and Matthew Willison. 2013. “A Network Model of Financial System Resilience.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 85 (January): 219–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.04.006.
Google Scholar

Andrieş, A., Nistor, S., and Sprincean, N. 2020. The Impact of Central Bank Transparency on Systemic Risk—Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Research in International Business and Finance 51, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.06.002.
Google Scholar

Babus, Ana. 2016. “The Formation of Financial Networks.” The RAND Journal of Economics 47 (2): 239–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12126.
Google Scholar

Babus, Ana, and Tai-Wei Hu. 2017. “Endogenous Intermediation in Over-the-Counter Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics 125 (1): 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.009.
Google Scholar

Bank Anglii. 2022. “2022 list of UK firms designated as other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs)”. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2022/november/2022-list-of-uk-firms-designated-as-osiisBank (dostęp 28.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Barkauskaite, A., Lakstutiene, A., and Witkowska, J. 2018. Measurement of Systemic Risk in a Common European Union Risk-Based Deposit Insurance System: Formal Necessity or Value-Adding Process? Risks 6(4), 137, https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6040137.
Google Scholar

Benoit, Sylvain, Jean-Edouard Colliard, Christophe Hurlin, and Christophe Pérignon. 2017. “Where the Risks Lie: A Survey on Systemic Risk.” Review of Finance 21 (1): 109–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfw026.
Google Scholar

Biais, Bruno, Florian Heider, and Marie Hoerova. 2016. “Risk-Sharing or Risk-Taking? Counterparty Risk, Incentives, and Margins.” The Journal of Finance 71 (4): 1669–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12396.
Google Scholar

Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A., and Valavanis, S. 2012. A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics. Annual Review of Financial Economics 4(1), 255–96 (https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110311-101754).
Google Scholar

Brownlees, Ch., and Engle, R. 2017. SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk. Review of Financial Studies 30(1), 48–79 https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw060.
Google Scholar

Castiglionesi, Fabio, Noemi Navarro. 2011. “Fragile Financial Networks”. Working paper. Tilburg University, https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/optimal-fragile-financial-networks.
Google Scholar

CFA. 2023. Systemic Risk and Management in Finance. https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/advocacy/issues/systemic-risk (dostęp 23.02.2023).
Google Scholar

Chan-Lau, Jorge A., Marco Espinosa, and Juan Sole. 2009. “On the Use of Network Analysis to Assess Systemic Financial Linkages”. Global Financial Stability Report, kwiecień. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
Google Scholar

Chen, Daniel, and Darrell Duffie. 2021. "Market Fragmentation." American Economic Review, 111 (7): 2247-74. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20200829
Google Scholar

Cifuentes, Rodrigo, Hyun Shin, and Gianluigi Ferrucci. 2005. “Liquidity Risk and Contagion”. Journal of the European Economic Association 3: 556–66.
Google Scholar

Drehmann, Mathias, and Nikola Tarashev. 2011. “Systemic Importance: Some Simple Indicators”. BIS Quarterly Review, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1785264 (dostęp12 luty 2021).
Google Scholar

Duffie Darrell. 2014. “Financial Market Infrastructure: Too Important to Fail”. in: Martin Neil Baily and John B. Taylor (ed). Across the Great Divide: New Perspectives on the Financial Crisis. Book Chapter 11. 251–57. Hoover Institution, Stanford University.
Google Scholar

Duffie, Darrell, and Haoxiang Zhu. 2011. “Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?” Review of Asset Pricing Studies 1 (1): 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/rar001.
Google Scholar

Dumicic, M. 2018. Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies in Central and Eastern European Countries. Edited by Croatian National Bank, Zagreb, Croatia. Public Sector Economics 42(1), 1–19 https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.42.1.1.
Google Scholar

Dyrektywa Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2013/36/UE z dnia 26 czerwca 2013 r. w sprawie warunków dopuszczenia instytucji kredytowych do działalności oraz nadzoru ostrożnościowego nad instytucjami kredytowymi i firmami inwestycyjnymi, zmieniająca dyrektywę 2002/87/WE i uchylająca dyrektywy 2006/48/WE oraz 2006/49/WE, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PL/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0036&from=EL (dostęp: 12.05.2023)
Google Scholar

Europejska Rada ds. Ryzyka Systemowego, ERRS, 2023. Systemically important institutions, https://www.esrb.europa.eu/national_policy/systemically/html/index.en.html (dostęp 12.05.2023).
Google Scholar

Europejski Urząd Nadzoru Bankowego, EUNB. 2014. Guidelines on Criteria to Assess Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SIIs) – European Banking Authority. 16 grudnia, https://eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/own-funds/guidelines-on-criteria-to-to-assess-other-systemically-important-institutions-o-siis-/-/regulatory-activity/press-release (dostęp 12.05.2023).
Google Scholar

Europejski Urząd Nadzoru Bankowego, EUNB. 2023. “Global Systemically Important Institutions (G-SIIs).” https://www.eba.europa.eu/risk-analysis-and-data/global-systemically-important-institutions.
Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Larry, and Thomas H. Noe. 2001. “Systemic Risk in Financial Systems.” Management Science 47 (2): 236–49. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.47.2.236.9835.
Google Scholar

Elliott, Matthew, Benjamin Golub, and Matthew O. Jackson. 2014. “Financial Networks and Contagion.” American Economic Review 104 (10): 3115–53. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3115.
Google Scholar

Engle, R., Capellini, R., and Reis, B. 2023. V-Lab: Systemic Risk Analysis – Summary (https://vlab.stern.nyu.edu/welcome/srisk).
Google Scholar

European Systemic Risk Board, ESRB. 2023. “Systemically Important Institutions.” https://www.esrb.europa.eu/national_policy/systemically/html/index.en.html (dostep 28.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Farboodi, Maryam. 2021. ”Intermediation and Voluntary Exposure to Counterparty Risk”. NBER Working paper No. 29467.
Google Scholar

Gai, Prasanna, 2013. "Systemic Risk: The Dynamics of Modern Financial Systems," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199544493, November.
Google Scholar

Gai, Prasanna, and Sujit Kapadia. 2010. “Contagion in Financial Networks.” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 466 (2120): 2401–23. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0410.
Google Scholar

Galanos, Alexios. 2022. rmgarch: Multivariate GARCH models. R package 1.3-9. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmgarch/rmgarch.pdf.
Google Scholar

Glasserman, Paul and Peyton Young. 2015. “Contagion in Financial Networks”. Office of Financial Research Working Paper No. 15-21, October 20.
Google Scholar

Hattori A., Kikuchi K., Niwa F., Uchida Y. 2014. A survey of systemic risk measures: Methodology and application to the Japanese market. Bank of Japan IMES Discussion Paper No. 2014-E-3
Google Scholar

Hollo, D., Kremer, M., and Lo Duca, M. 2012. CISS - A Composite Indicator of Systemic Stress in the Financial System. European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 1426 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1611717.
Google Scholar

Jajuga K., Jajuga T. 2006. Inwestycje. Instrumenty finansowe, aktywa finansowe, ryzyko finansowe, inżynieria finansowa, PWN
Google Scholar

Jajuga, K., Karaś, M., Kuziak, K. and Szczepaniak, W. 2017. Ryzyko systemu finansowego. Materiały i Studia, 329.
Google Scholar

Jakubík, P., and Slačík, T. 2013. Measuring Financial (In)Stability in Emerging Europe: A New Index-Based Approach. Financial Stability Report by the Oesterreichische Nationalbank, 25, 102–17.
Google Scholar

Jočienė, A. 2015. Scandinavian Bank Subsidiaries in the Baltics: Have They All Behaved in a Similar Way? Intellectual Economics 9(1), 43–54 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intele.2015.09.002.
Google Scholar

Kaufman, George G. 1992. “Bank Contagion: Theory and Evidence”. Working Papers Series 92-13. Issues in Financial Regulation. Research Department. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. June.
Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Teruyoshi. 2013. “Network versus Portfolio Structure in Financial Systems.” The European Physical Journal B 86 (10): 434. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40072-9.
Google Scholar

Koeppl, Thorsten, Cyril Monnet, and Ted Temzelides. 2012. “Optimal Clearing Arrangements for Financial Trades.” Journal of Financial Economics 103 (1): 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.08.008.
Google Scholar

Karkowska, R. 2013. Systemic Risk in Central and Eastern European Banking and Its Determinants. Merton Option Model Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2349017.
Google Scholar

Kubinschi, M., and Barnea, D. 2016. Systemic Risk Impact on Economic Growth - the Case of the CEE Countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 16.
Google Scholar

Lietuvos Bankas 2019. Financial Stability Review, 1/2019, https://www.lb.lt/uploads/publications/docs/22310_a0027c03a416ff96725ed404b9cc9bcc.pdf.
Google Scholar

Lubiński, Marek 2013. “Międzynarodowy rynek pieniężny i zarażenie”, Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics 264: 19–41.
Google Scholar

Marcinkowska, M. 2023. Ryzyko w europejskim systemie bankowym, Bezpieczny Bank, 91(2), s. 8–33, doi: 10.26354/bb.1.2.91.2023.
Google Scholar

Markose, Sheri, Simone Giansante, and Ali Rais Shaghaghi. 2012. “‘Too Interconnected to Fail’ Financial Network of US CDS Market: Topological Fragility and Systemic Risk.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 83 (3): 627–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.016.
Google Scholar

Nier, Erlend W. and Yang, Jing and Yorulmazer, Tanju and Alentorn, Amadeo. 2008. “Network Models and Financial Stability”. Bank of England Working Paper No. 346.
Google Scholar

Pala, Melissa. 2022. “COVID-19 and the Fragmentation of the European Interbank Market” (November 23, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4268232 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4268232.
Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Google Scholar

Radulescu, M., Logica B., and Sinisi, C. 2018. Developments of the CEE Banking Sectors after the Financial Crisis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence 12(1), 851–63, https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2018-0076.
Google Scholar

Scott, Hal. S. 2012. “Interconnectedness and contagion”. Committee on Capital Markets Regulation, 16-18, November 20.
Google Scholar

Silva, Walmir, Herbert Kimura, and Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro. 2017. “An Analysis of the Literature on Systemic Financial Risk: A Survey.” Journal of Financial Stability 28 (February): 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.12.004.
Google Scholar

Smaga, Piotr. 2014. ”The Concept of Systemic Risk”, Systemic Risk Centre, LSE, Special Paper Series, No. 5.
Google Scholar

System Rezerwy Federalnej. 2023. Financial Stability Report, https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/financial-stability-report-20230508.pdf (dostęp 28.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Volatility Lab, Stern Business School, New York University, NYU SBS. 2023, https://vlab.stern.nyu.edu/ (dostęp 28.08.2023).
Google Scholar

Zawadowski, Adam. 2013. “Entangled Financial Systems” Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(5), 1291–1323 .
Google Scholar

Vol. 92 No. 3 (2023)
Published: 2023-11-03

ISSN: 1429-2939

eISSN: 2544-7068

10.26354

Publisher

Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny

Licence CC

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submit

-->