Język Polski
English
Paneuropejski system gwarantowania depozytów – część II (propozycja konstrukcji)
Paweł Smaga
Abstract
As the fragmented net of unharmonized national DGSs in the EU failed to contribute to financial stability at an EU-level during the financial crisis, creating a pan‑European DGS seems to be a better solution. The author therefore proposes an optimal design of the third pillar of the banking union by analyzing the typical DGS features in the pan‑European context. Effective functioning of the SSM and the SRM are key prerequisites for establishing a pan‑European DGS successfully, based on gradual harmonization of national DGSs, along with pooling of funds. The design of a pan‑European DGS should also fulfill international recommendations in this respect.
Keywords:
banking union, deposit guarantee scheme, financial crisisSimilar Articles
- Paweł Smaga, A pan-European deposit guarantee system – part I (lessons from the crisis) , Safe Bank: Tom 51/52 Nr 2/3 (2013): Bezpieczny Bank
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Paweł Smaga, Błażej Dudkiewicz, European Central Bank and Financial Supervision in the European Union versus Financial Stability , Safe Bank: Vol. 66 No. 1 (2017)
- Paweł Smaga, Measuring financial stability and role of the central bank , Safe Bank: Vol. 57 No. 4 (2014): Bezpieczny Bank
- Paweł Smaga, A pan-European deposit guarantee system – part I (lessons from the crisis) , Safe Bank: Tom 51/52 Nr 2/3 (2013): Bezpieczny Bank
- Paweł Smaga, Powiązania między sektorem bankowym a kryzysem zadłużeniowym w strefie euro , Safe Bank: Vol. 48 No. 3 (2012): Bezpieczny Bank
- Paweł Smaga, Europejska Rada ds. Ryzyka Systemowego i wyzwania przed nią stojące , Safe Bank: Vol. 43 No. 1 (2011): Bezpieczny Bank
Details
References
Statistics
Authors
Citation rules
Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.