Differentiating between Sincere and Insincere Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Evidence from the German Banking Industry

Francesc Relano; Elisabeth Paulet

Published: 2014-05-01

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2014)

Differentiating between Sincere and Insincere Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Evidence from the German Banking Industry

Francesc Relano , Elisabeth Paulet

Abstract

This paper analyses the difference in the CSR commitment between different types of banks, based on the German example. It compares the three traditional groups (Commercial, Cooperative and Savings Banks) and a new type of bank which emerged in the 1980s: ethical banks. For each of these four types of financial institution, the main objective is to see if there is a difference between what the banks declare (through analysis of CSR policies in their annual reports) and what the banks actually do (through analysis of their financial statements). The conclusion is that a sincere commitment to CSR involves a substantial change in the banks business model. An analysis of the banking industry shows that only a few institutions are ready to take a step forward in this direction.

Keywords:

Ethical banks , CSR in banking

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Relano, F., & Paulet, E. (2014). Differentiating between Sincere and Insincere Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Evidence from the German Banking Industry. Safe Bank, 55(2), 65–84. Retrieved from https://ojs.bfg.pl/index.php/bb/article/view/376

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Abott, W.F. and Monsen, R.J. (1979): “On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self-Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 22, n° 3, pp. 501–515.
Google Scholar

Alexander, G.J., and Buchholz, R.A. (1978): “Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 21, n° 3, pp. 479–486.
Google Scholar

Aupperle, K.E., Carroll, A.B., and Hatfield, J.D. (1985): “An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28, n° 2, pp. 446–463.
Google Scholar

Ayadi, R., Schmidt, R.H., and Carbo Valverde, S. (2009): Investigating Diversity in the Banking Sector in Europe: the performance and role of Savings Banks, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.
Google Scholar

Bakan, J. (2004): The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power, Free Press, New York.
Google Scholar

Berle, A. (1931): “Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust”, Harvard Law Review, vol. 44, n° 7, pp. 1049–1074.
Google Scholar

Bowen, H.R. (1953): Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Google Scholar

Brammer, S., Jackson, G., and Matten, D. (2012): “Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance”, Socio-Economic Review, vol. 10, pp. 3–28.
Google Scholar

Callan, S.J. and Thomas, J.M. (2009): “Corporate Financial Performance and Corporate Social Performance: An Update and Reinvestigation”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 16, pp. 61–78.
Google Scholar

Carroll, A.B. (1979): “A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, n° 4, pp. 497–505.
Google Scholar

Carroll, A.B. (1991): “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders”, Business Horizons, vol. 34, iss. 4, pp. 39–48.
Google Scholar

De Clerck, F. (2009): “Ethical Banking”, in Zosolnai, L., Boda, Z., and Fekete, L., eds.: Ethical Prospects: Economy, Society and Environment, Berlin, Springer, pp. 209–227.
Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W. (1983): “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, vol. 48, pp. 147–160.
Google Scholar

Dodd, E. M. (1932): “For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees?, Harvard Law Review, vol. 45, n° 7, pp. 1145–1163.
Google Scholar

Durbin, A., Herz, S., Hunter, D., Peck, J. (2006): Shaping the Future of Sustainable Finance: moving from paper promises to performance. London: BankTrack.
Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, M.K. (1989): “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, n° 1, pp. 57–74.
Google Scholar

Freeman, R.E. (ed. 2010): Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press (first published in 1984).
Google Scholar

Friedman, M. (1970): “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, The New York Times Magazine, September 13, pp. 30–35.
Google Scholar

Garcia-Castro, R., Arino, M.A., and Canela, M.A. (2009): “Does Social Performance Really Lead to Financial Performance? Accounting for Endogeneity”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 92, n° 1, pp. 107–126.
Google Scholar

Giddings, B., Hopwood B. and G. O’Brien (2002): Environment, Economy and Society: fitting them together into sustainable development, Sustainable Development, vol. 10, issue 4, pp. 187–196.
Google Scholar

Jensen, M.C. (2001): “Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function”, European Financial Management, vol. 7, n° 3, pp. 297–317.
Google Scholar

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976): “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, n° 4, pp. 305–360.
Google Scholar

Jeucken, M. (2001): Sustainable Finance and Banking: the Financial Sector and the Future of the Planet, Earthscan Publication Ltd, London.
Google Scholar

Laan, G., Ees, H., and Witteloostuijn, A. (2007): “Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Extended Stakeholder Theory, and Empirical Test with Accounting Measures”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 79, n° 3, pp. 299–310.
Google Scholar

Loiselet, E. (2000): “L’investissement socialement responsable: genèse, méthodes, enjeux”, L’économie politique, vol. 7, pp. 6–31.
Google Scholar

Lopez, M.V., Garcia, A., and Rodriguez, L. (2007): “Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 75, n° 3, pp. 285–300.
Google Scholar

Makni, R., Francoeur, C., and Bellavance, F. (2008): “Causality Between Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: Evidence from Canadian Firms”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 89, n° 3, pp. 409–422.
Google Scholar

Margolis, J., H. Elfenbein, and J. Walsh (2007): Does it Pay to Be Good? A Meta-analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial performance, Working Paper, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan.
Google Scholar

Neville, B.A., Bell, S.J., and Mengüç, B. (2005): “Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance-financial performance relationship”, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 39, issue 9/10, pp. 1184–1198.
Google Scholar

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., and Rynes, S.L. (2003): “Corporate Social and Financial Performance”, Organization Studies, vol. 24, n° 3, pp. 403–441.
Google Scholar

Palomo, R. and Carrasco, I. (2001): “Le caractère spécifique des groupes bancaires coopératifs dans un environnement financier global”, in Côté, D. (ed.), Les holdings cooperatives, Brussels, De Boeck Université, pp. 139–160.
Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. and Kelly, G. (2001): “The Conceptual Foundations of the Firm”, in Parkinson, J., Gamble, A., and Kelly, G., eds.: The Political Economy of the Company, Oxford, Hart Publishing, pp. 113–140.
Google Scholar

Paulet, E. and Relano, F. (2011): “Navigating the Financial Crisis in Helvetic Waters: An Analysis of the Banking Sector”, Journal of Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, vol. 1, n° 2, pp. 65–78.
Google Scholar

Peters, R. and Mullen, M.R. (2009): “Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance”, Journal of Global Business Issues, vol. 3, n° 1, pp. 1–15.
Google Scholar

Redler, E. (1994): European financial sector privatization and demutualization: trends, practices and effects, London, Financial Times Management Report.
Google Scholar

Relano, F. (2008): “From Sustainable Finance to Ethical Banking”, Transformations in Business & Economics, vol. 7, n° 3, pp. 123–131.
Google Scholar

Relano, F. and Paulet, E. (2012): “Corporate responsibility in the banking sector: a proposed typology for the German case”, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 54, Iss. 5, pp. 379–393.
Google Scholar

Rettab, B., Brik, A.B. and Mellahi, K. (2008): “A Study of Management Perceptions of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organisational Performance in Emerging Economies: The Case of Dubai”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 89, n° 3, pp. 371–390.
Google Scholar

Saeed, K. (2004): “Designing an environmental mitigation banking institution for linking the size of economic activity to environmental capacity”, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 38, n° 4, pp. 909–937.
Google Scholar

Scholtens, B. (2009): “Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Banking Industry”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 86, n° 2, pp. 159–175.
Google Scholar

Schreck, P. (2011): “Reviewing the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: New Evidence and Analysis, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 103, n° 2, pp. 167–188.
Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: printed for William Strahan and Thomas Cadell, vol. 2.
Google Scholar

Soana, M.G. (2011): “The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance”, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 104, n° 1, pp. 133–148.
Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J.V. (2007): Buyers and Financiers of the Wilmar Group, Amsterdam, Profundo.
Google Scholar

Van Gelder, J.V. and Denie S. (2007): Mind the Gap: benchmarking credit policies of international banks, Utrech, BankTrack.
Google Scholar