Język Polski
English
Position of the European Financial Congress on the Supplementary Supervision of Financial Conglomerates
Abstrakt
This article presents the position of the European Financial Congress in relation to the European Commission’s consultation document on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate. From 9th June till 20th September 2016, the EC ran a public consultation on the evaluation of the financial conglomerate directive (FICOD), whether it delivers on its objective to identify and manage group risks, i.e. multiple gearing, excessive leveraging of capital, contagion, complexity management, concentration and conflict of interest. Financial conglomerates were originally represented by bancassurance. Over time financial institutions have expanded into investment banking, asset management and other financial activities, with separate segment supervisions. Now, they are getting bigger, more complex and international, expanding into the real economy, outsourcing critical processes to non-regulated external offshore companies. Moreover, manufacturing companies are developing competencies in banking area and traditional financial institutions are being challenged by expanding fintech projects. The evaluation of supplementary supervision shall lead to better regulation in terms of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence and added value. As a result, the legislation shall contribute to enhanced financial stability, safeguard creditors’ and policyholders’ interests, and promote the competitiveness of financial conglomerates within the EU and at international level. From the Polish perspective, FICOD shall protect the financial system from the import of group risks and lead to secure growth of local financial conglomerates, enjoying a level playing field in the EU. The EC consultation paper was addressed by representatives of different groups of stakeholders in the Polish financial market, including in particular: universal banks, auto loan companies, insurance undertakings, regulatory bodies, consulting firms and academia.
Pobierz pliki
Zasady cytowania
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Inne teksty tego samego autora
- Andrzej Dżuryk, Wpływ reform regulacyjnych na finansowanie inwestycji infrastrukturalnych. Opinia polskich ekspertów w konsultacjach Rady Stabilności Finansowej , Bezpieczny Bank: Tom 75 Nr 2 (2019)
- Andrzej Dżuryk, Rola listów zastawnych w zwiększaniu stabilności sektora finansowego w Polsce , Bezpieczny Bank: Tom 56 Nr 3 (2014): Bezpieczny Bank
- Andrzej Dżuryk, Funding of Banks in Resolution , Bezpieczny Bank: Tom 71 Nr 2 (2018)
- Marcin Borsuk, Adequate loss-absorbing capacity in the resolution process , Bezpieczny Bank: Tom 60 Nr 3 (2015)
- Marcin Borsuk, Koncepcja wymogu bufora testów warunków skrajnych , Bezpieczny Bank: Tom 70 Nr 1 (2018)
Tom 65 Nr 4 (2016)
Opublikowane: 2016-12-18
10.26354
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Na tych samych warunkach 4.0 Międzynarodowe.